SAMSUNG S22 ULTRA VS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808

▒ DIRECT COMPARISON

In the very beginning of the test I underline the fact that we are comparing only resolution and not the dynamic range. In this category older FSI sensor is an outsider, for sure. Today’s rival is [Samsung S22 Ultra] with 1/1.33" sensor. A lil’ smaller than mighty Nokia 808, which comes with 1/1.2". Now let’s see how Nokia will hold up in such situation.

Glitchy modern browsers can easily alter image quality during page rendering or badly construe scaling factors, so i suggest to download original images from my cloud storage and pixel peep them at 100% manually.

ON THE LEFT SIDE IS SAMSUNG S22 ULTRA DNG
ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808
PULL ► GREEN HANDLE ◄ TO SLIDE THE COMPARISON

DNG files of Samsung S22 Ultra were converted using [Capture One Pro 21]

ANGLE OF PICTURES AND FOCUS POINTS DIFFER A BIT DUE TO DIFFERENT FOCAL DISTANCES OF THE DEVICES AND LIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME TO DO A TEST. IT'S BETTER THAN NOTHING AND IT WILL GIVE US SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT.

UPCLOSE TEST

PROCESSED 808

LANDSCAPE TEST

PROCESSED 808

It is clearly visible how Samsung struggles to output clean picture in dim light of supermarket store.
Nokia is doin’ just fine, without any hesitations.

▒ RAW FILES

▲ BACK TO TOP

▒ BOTTOM LINE

This was another useless attempt at dethroning Nokia 808 from the “King of Resolution” title.

And it looks like that i’m finally fed up with these comparisons and finding better modern alternative to Nokia 808. Yeah, i’ve done with this.
But if you find improperly interesting candidate…. to battle with Nokia Pureview 808 [drop me a line] .

▒ OTHER 808 TESTS

► [OPPO FIND X6 PRO vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [SONY XPERIA PRO-I vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [HUAWEI P50 PRO vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [XIAOMI 11 ULTRA vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [IPHUCK 13 PRO HYPER MAX vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [IPHUCK 15 PRO HYPER MAX vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [SHARP AQUOS R7 vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]