▒ DIRECT COMPARISON
In the very beginning of the test I underline the fact that we are comparing only resolution and not the dynamic range. In this category older FSI sensor is an outsider, for sure. Today’s rival is [Xiaomi MI 11 Ultra] with 1/1.12" sensor. A tad larger than mighty Nokia 808, which comes with 1/1.2". Now let’s see how Nokia will hold up in such situation.
Glitchy modern browsers can easily alter image quality during page rendering or badly construe scaling factors, so i suggest to download original images from my cloud storage and pixel peep them at 100% manually.
ON THE LEFT SIDE IS XIAOMI Mi11 ULTRA DNG
ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808
PULL ► GREEN HANDLE ◄ TO SLIDE THE COMPARISON
DNG files of Xiaomi Mi Ultra 11 were converted using [Capture One Pro 21]
CLOSE UP TEST
▒ RAW FILES
▒ BOTTOM LINE
NO SURPRISE HERE. AGAIN.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra outputs very neat dynamic range [for a smartphone]. Internal JPG’s look like sh#t. DNG is nice.
Nokia PureView 808 firmly shows stong details, as always. Color can be corrected in your favorite raster editor. However dynamic range is poor due to the sensor age.
Stay tuned for [Huawei P50 Pro] comparison!
AFTERWORDS: If you find errors or just want to report something important don’t hesitate to [drop me a line]
▒ OTHER 808 TESTS
► [SONY XPERIA PRO-I vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [HUAWEI P50 PRO vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [SAMSUNG S22 ULTRA vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [IPHUCK 13 PRO HYPER MAX vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]
► [SHARP AQUOS R7 vs NOKIA PUREVIEW 808]